Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association HPB Ultrasound and Advanced Technology post-graduate course: Overview and review.

Background: Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA) established the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) ultrasound (US) and Advanced Technology Post-Graduate Course in 2012 in response to a perceived gap in training and practice. Methods: The HPB US and Advanced Technology Post-Graduate Course consists of both didactic and hands-on skills sessions. The didactic sessions are divided into foundational, organ-focused, and application content. Hands-on sessions are constructed to immediately practice skills in the simulation setting which were taught during the didactic sessions. Course participant demographic data (practice location and practice type) and participant evaluations were reported. Results: Since the first course in 2012, 298 participants have taken the post-graduate course. Most participants reported the content quality, delivery effectiveness, and practice relevance to be either excellent or above average (93.6 %, 91.1 %, 93.6 %, respectively). Participants' motivations to take the course included to enhance skills, knowledge, to incorporate US into practice, or to obtain formal training or qualification/certification, or to teach. Conclusion: The HPB US and Advanced Technology Post-Graduate Course has filled a gap in HPB US training for practicing HPB surgeons. The annual course has been well-received by participants (Kirkpatrick Level 1 Program Evaluation) and will continue to fill the gap in training in operative US for the HPB surgeon. Key message: Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association established the HPB Ultrasound and Advanced Technology Post-Graduate Course in 2012. The Course has been well-received by participants and will continue to address a gap in surgical HPB training.

Ultrasound scanning techniques.

Background: Ultrasound is an essential tool for the hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeon. Methods: This review focuses on transabdominal, open intraoperative, and laparoscopic ultrasonography of the liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. The goal is to obtain optimal ultrasound images through an understanding of the equipment setup, transducer (probe) selection, terminology, and general scanning principles. Outlined is a structured, standardized approach necessary to obtain complete information when doing intraoperative ultrasound. When done by the surgeon, the goal of the examination typically is to answer a question or questions through a focused rather than a comprehensive diagnostic examination. Finally, presented are the details of techniques specific to scanning each of the major organs. Results: A structured, standardized ultrasound scanning approach provides for optimal image acquisition. It allows one to develop standardized views of common structures resulting in "pattern recognition," making learning and interpreting images easier. A standardized approach ensures a complete ultrasound examination, and it minimizes the chance of missed findings. Summary: The general principles for transabdominal, open intraoperative, and laparoscopic ultrasonography scanning are similar. One can gather considerable information using these modalities during a clinical examination, procedure, or operation. For success, it is critical to develop a standardized approach to scanning and use it every time. This facilitates familiarity when viewing images, making it easier for the novice to learn and gain experience. Using a systematic approach ensures that the experienced ultrasonographer obtains all the essential information needed at the time of surgery.

Efficacy of opioid spinal analgesia for postoperative pain management after pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of single-shot opioid spinal analgesia after pancreatoduodenectomy remains understudied and lacks comparison to standard continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). METHODS: Pancreatoduodenectomy patients who underwent TEA or opioid spinal for postoperative pain management from 2015 to 2020 were included in this observational cohort study. Primary outcome was patient-reported mean daily pain scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and length of stay (LOS). Multivariable linear regression models were constructed to compare risk-adjusted outcomes. RESULTS: 180 patients were included: 56 TEA and 124 opioid spinal. Compared to epidural patients, opioid spinal patients were more likely to be older (67.0 vs. 64.6, p=0.045), have greater BMI (26.5 vs. 24.4, p=0.02), and less likely to be smokers (19.4% vs. 41.1%, p=0.002). Opioid spinal, compared to TEA, was associated with lower intraoperative MMEs (0.25 vs. 22.7, p<0.001) and postoperative daily MMEs (7.9 vs. 10.3, p=0.03) on univariate analysis. However, after multivariable adjustment, there was no difference in average pain scores across the postoperative period (spinal vs. epidural: 4.18 vs. 4.14, p=0.93), daily MMEs (p=0.50), or LOS (p=0.23). DISCUSSION: There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores, opioid use, or LOS between patients managed with TEA or opioid spinal after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Early Patient Discharge in Selected Patients is Not Associated With Higher Readmission After Major Abdominal Operations.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the associations between early discharge and readmission after major abdominal operations. BACKGROUND: Advances in patient care resulted in earlier patient discharge after complex abdominal operations. Whether early discharge is associated with patient readmissions remains controversial. METHODS: Patients who had colorectal, liver, and pancreas operations abstracted in 2011-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files were included. Patient readmission was stratified by 6 operative groups. Patients who were discharged before median discharge date within each operative group were categorized as an early discharge. Analyses tested associations between early discharge and likelihood of 30-day postoperative unplanned readmission. RESULTS: A total of 364,609 patients with major abdominal operations were included. Individual patient groups and corresponding median day of discharge were: laparoscopic colectomy (n = 152,575; median = 4), open colectomy (n =137,462; median = 7), laparoscopic proctectomy (n = 12,238; median = 5), open proctectomy (n = 24,925; median = 6), major hepatectomy (n = 9,805; median = 6), pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 27,604; median = 8). Early discharge was not associated with an increase in proportion of readmissions in any operative group. Early discharge was associated with a decrease in average proportion of patient readmissions compared to patients discharged on median date in each of the operative groups: laparoscopic colectomy 6% versus 8%, open colectomy 11% versus 14%, laparoscopic proctectomy 13% versus 16%, open proctectomy 13% vs 17%, major hepatectomy 8% versus 12%, pancreatoduodenectomy 16% versus 20% (all P ≤ 0.02). Serious morbidity composite was significantly lower in patients who were discharged early than those who were not in each operative group (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge in selected patients after major abdominal operations is associated with lower, and not higher, rate of 30-day unplanned readmission.

The impact of cirrhosis and MELD score on postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients selected for liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Independent associations between chronic liver disease, MELD, and postoperative outcomes among patients selected for liver resection have not been completely established. We hypothesized independent associations between MELD, cirrhosis, and postoperative mortality. METHODS: Patient-level data from the targeted hepatectomy module and ACS NSQIP PUF during 2014-2015 were merged. Multivariable regression models with interaction effect between MELD and liver texture (normal, congested/fatty, cirrhotic) tested the independent effects of covariates on mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: 3,530 patients were included, of whom 668 patients (19%) had cirrhosis. ACS NSQIP defined mortality (3.9%vs1.1%) and morbidity (23.5%vs15.8%) were higher in patients with cirrhosis (both p < 0.001). In multivariable models, cirrhosis (OR = 2.24; 95%CI:1.16-4.34, p = 0.016) and MELD (OR = 1.10; 95%CI:1.03-1.18, p = 0.007) were independently associated with mortality. MELD (OR = 1.04; 95%CI:1.002-1.08, p = 0.038) was associated with postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Higher MELD and presence of cirrhosis have an independent negative effect on mortality after liver resection. MELD could be used to estimate postoperative risk in patients with and without cirrhosis.

Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma ≤3 cm.

Optimal treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 3 cm remains controversial. Ablation and chemoembolization are considered for nonoperative candidates. This study compares survival among patients with solitary HCC ≤ 3 cm treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Patients diagnosed with HCC ≤ 3 cm between 2005 and 2014 were included. Kaplan-Meier survival functions with log-rank tests were used to estimate recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) survival. Among 161 patients with solitary HCC ≤ 3 cm, 145 patients with mean age of 65.2 years (±9.2) and 95 per cent prevalence of cirrhosis had operative treatment or TACE, and/or RFA. From this cohort, 27 (19%) patients had TACE, 27 (19%) patients had RFA, and 15 (10%) patients had TACE/RFA. The patients treated with definitive TACE, RFA, or TACE/RFA had a similar 1-year recurrence-free survival (23% vs 27% vs 36%, respectively, P = 0.445) and similar 5-year OS (21% vs 24% vs 33%, respectively, P = 0.287). Thirty-five (24%) patients were bridged to transplantation with TACE and/or RFA. The 5-year OS was significantly improved in patients bridged to transplantation (P < 0.001). Survival does not differ between patients with solitary HCC ≤ 3 cm treated with TACE or RFA. Patients who were bridged to transplantation had significantly greater OS compared with patients who were not transplanted.

Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death.

BACKGROUND: Safety of pancreaticoduodenectomy has improved significantly in the past 3 decades. Current inpatient and 30-d mortality rates are low. However, incidence and causes of 90-d and 1-y mortality are poorly defined and largely unexplored. METHODS: All patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2007 and 2016 were included in this single institution, retrospective cohort study. Distributions of pancreaticoduodenectomy-specific morbidity and cause-specific mortality were compared between early (within 90 d) and late (91-365 d) postoperative recovery periods. RESULTS: A total of 551 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed during the study period. Of these, 6 (1.1%), 20 (3.6%), and 91 (16.5%) patients died within 30, 90, and 365 d after pancreaticoduodenectomy, respectively. Causes of early and late mortality varied significantly (all P ≤ 0.032). The most common cause of death within 90 d was due to multisystem organ failure from sepsis or aspiration in 9 (45%) patients, followed by post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage in 5 (25%) patients, and cardiopulmonary arrest from myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus in 3 (15%) patients. In contrast, recurrent cancer was the most common cause of death in 46 (65%) patients during the late postoperative period between 91 and 365 d. Mortality from failure to thrive and debility was similar between early and late postoperative periods (15% versus 19.7%, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Most quality improvement initiatives in patients selected for pancreaticoduodenectomy have focused on reduction of technical complications and improvement of early postoperative mortality. Further reduction in postoperative mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy can be achieved by improving patient selection, mitigating postoperative malnutrition, and optimizing preoperative cancer staging and management strategies.

Pancreatic duct size and gland texture are associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy but not after distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula remains a morbid complication after pancreatectomy. Since the proposed mechanism of pancreatic fistula is different between pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, we hypothesized that pancreatic gland texture and duct size are not associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: All patients ≥18 years in the 2014-15 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) targeted pancreatectomy dataset were linked with the ACS NSQIP Public Use File (PUF). Pancreatic duct size (<3 mm, 3-6 mm, >6 mm) and pancreatic gland texture (hard, intermediate, soft) were categorized. Separate multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate associations between pancreatic duct size and gland texture after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: A total of 9366 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy during the study period. Proportion of pancreatic fistula was similar after distal pancreatectomy (606 of 3132, 19.4%) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (1163 of 6335, 18.4%, p = 0.245). Both pancreatic gland texture and duct size were significantly associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (p<0.001). However, there was no association between pancreatic fistula and gland texture or duct size (all p≥0.169) after distal pancreatectomy. Operative approach (minimally invasive versus open) was not associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy (p = 0.626). Patients with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy had increased rate of postoperative complications including longer length of stay, higher rates of readmission and reoperation compared to patients who did not have a pancreatic fistula (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike among patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic gland texture and duct size are not associated with development of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. Other clinical factors should be considered in this patient population.

Molecular analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid changes clinical management.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: DNA molecular analysis has been suggested as a tool to evaluate pancreatic cysts. This study assesses whether the addition of DNA molecular analysis alters clinical management. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 46 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of pancreatic cysts with DNA molecular analysis at two major academic institutions. Cases were presented to two pancreaticobiliary surgeons first without and then with DNA molecular analysis data. The primary outcome was the frequency with which clinical management was altered with the addition of DNA molecular analysis. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a mean age of 62.0 (±13.4) years and mean cyst size of 3.2 (±2.3) cm were included in the study. Cyst carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was available in 30 patients and ranged from 0.4 to 15,927 ng/mL. DNA molecular analysis was described as benign in 23 (50%), statistically indolent in 13 (28%), statistically higher risk in 9 (20%), and indeterminate in 1 (2%). Surgeon #1 changed the management in 13/46 cases (28%) and surgeon #2 changed the management in 12/46 cases (26%) with the addition of DNA molecular analysis. When organized by CEA concentration, those with an intermediate CEA (45-800 ng/mL) or without a CEA concentration had a management changed more frequently (40%) compared to all others (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of DNA molecular analysis alters the clinical management of pancreatic cystic lesions most often when CEA levels are intermediate (45-800 ng/mL) or when no CEA concentration is available. Use of DNA molecular analysis can be considered in this cohort. Further study of molecular markers in pancreatic cystic lesions is recommended.

Clinical Factors and Postoperative Impact of Bile Leak After Liver Resection.

BACKGROUND: Despite technical advances, bile leak remains a significant complication after hepatectomy. The current study uses a targeted multi-institutional dataset to characterize perioperative factors that are associated with bile leakage after hepatectomy to better understand the impact of bile leak on morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Adult patients in the 2014-2015 ACS NSQIP targeted hepatectomy dataset were linked to the ACS NSQIP PUF dataset. Bivariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the associations between clinical factors and post-hepatectomy bile leak. RESULTS: Of 6859 patients, 530 (7.7%) had a postoperative bile leak. Proportion of bile leaks was significantly greater in patients after major compared to minor hepatectomy (12.6 vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with bile leak was significantly greater in patients after major hepatectomy who had concomitant enterohepatic reconstruction (31.8 vs. 10.1%, p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality was significantly greater in patients with bile leaks (6.0 vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for significant covariates, bile leak was independently associated with increased risk of postoperative morbidity (OR = 4.55; 95% CI 3.72-5.56; p < 0.001). After adjusting for significant effects of postoperative complications, liver failure, and reoperation (all p<0.001), bile leak was not independently associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality (p = 0.262). CONCLUSION: Major hepatectomy and enterohepatic biliary reconstruction are associated with significantly greater rates of bile leak after liver resection. Bile leak is independently associated with significant postoperative morbidity. Mitigation of bile leak is critical in reducing morbidity and mortality after liver resection.

Operative management of chronic pancreatitis: A review.

BACKGROUND: Pain secondary to chronic pancreatitis is a difficult clinical problem to manage. Many patients are treated medically or undergo endoscopic therapy and surgical intervention is often reserved for those who have failed to gain adequate pain relief from a more conservative approach. RESULTS: There have been a number of advances in the operative management of chronic pancreatitis over the last few decades and current therapies include drainage procedures (pancreaticojejunostomy, etc.), resection (pancreticoduodenectomy, etc.) and combined drainage/resection procedures (Frey procedure, etc.). Additionally, many centers currently perform total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation, in addition to minimally invasive options that are intended to tailor therapy to individual patients. DISCUSSION: Operative management of chronic pancreatitis often improves quality of life, and is associated with low rates of morbidity and mortality. The decision as to which procedure is optimal for each patient should be based on a combination of pathologic changes, prior interventions, and individual surgeon and center experience.

Blood transfusion is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that blood transfusion is associated with increased risk of worse outcomes among patients selected for hepatectomy. However, the independent effect of transfusion has not been confirmed. We hypothesize that blood transfusion is an independent factor that affects outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients at tertiary care center who underwent hepatectomy between 2006 and 2013 were identified and linked with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program PUF data set. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of blood transfusion on 30-d mortality and morbidity, adjusted for differences in extent of resection and estimated probabilities of morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Among 522 patients in the study, 48 (9.2%) patients required perioperative blood transfusion within 72 h of resection, and 172 (33%) underwent major hepatectomy. Indications for hepatectomy included metastatic neoplasm (n = 229, 44%), primary hepatic neoplasm (n = 108, 21%), primary extra-hepatic biliary neoplasm (n = 23, 4%), and nonmalignant indications (n = 162, 31%). Eighty-eight (17%) patients had a postoperative morbidity. Blood transfusion was significantly associated with postoperative morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 4.18, 95% CI = 2.18-8.02, P = 0.0001) and mortality (OR = 14.5, 95% CI = 3.08-67.8, P = 001), after adjustment for the concurrent effect of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program estimated probability of morbidity (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.11-12.2, P = 0.042). The extent of resection was not significantly associated with morbidity (OR = 1.30, 95% CI, 0.74-2.28, P = 0.366) or mortality (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.24-5.50, P = 0.870). CONCLUSIONS: Blood transfusion is a highly statistically significant independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. Judicious use of perioperative transfusion is indicated in patients with benign and malignant indications for liver resection.

The impact of bacterial colonization on graft success after total pancreatectomy with autologous islet transplantation: considerations for early definitive surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether bacterial contamination of islets affects graft success after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). BACKGROUND: Factors associated with insulin independence after TPIAT are inconclusive. Although bacterial contamination does not preclude transplantation, the impact of bacterial contamination on graft success is unknown. METHODS: Patients who received TPIAT at the University of Virginia between January 2007 and January 2016 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed for bacterial contamination and patients were prospectively contacted to assess rates of insulin independence. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic or perioperative data between patients who achieved insulin independence and those who did not. However, six of 27 patients analyzed (22.2%) grew bacterial contaminants from culture of the final islet preparations. These patients had significantly lower islet yield and C-peptide at most recent follow-up (P<.05), and none of these patients achieved insulin independence. CONCLUSIONS: Islet transplant solutions are often culture positive, likely secondary to preprocurement pancreatic manipulation and introduction of enteric flora. Although autotransplantation of culture-positive islets is safe, it is associated with higher rates of graft failure and poor islet yield. Consideration should be given to identify patients who may develop refractory chronic pancreatitis and offer early operative management to prevent bacterial colonization.

Morbidity and Mortality After Gastrectomy: Identification of Modifiable Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity after gastrectomy remains high. The potentially modifiable risk factors have not been well described. This study considers a series of potentially modifiable patient-specific and perioperative characteristics that could be considered to reduce morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes adults in the ACS NSQIP PUF dataset who underwent gastrectomy between 2011 and 2013. Sequential multivariable models were used to estimate effects of clinical covariates on study outcomes including morbidity, mortality, readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: Three thousand six hundred and seventy-eight patients underwent gastrectomy. A majority of patients had distal gastrectomy (N = 2,799, 76.1 %) and had resection for malignancy (N = 2,316, 63.0 %). Seven hundred and ninety-eight patients (21.7 %) experienced a major complication. Reoperation was required in 290 patients (7.9 %). Thirty-day mortality was 5.2 %. Age (OR = 1.01, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.02, p = 0.001), preoperative malnutrition (OR = 1.65, 95 % CI = 1.35-2.02, p < 0.001), total gastrectomy (OR = 1.63, 95 % CI = 1.31-2.03, p < 0.001), benign indication for resection (OR = 1.60, 95 % CI = 1.29-1.97, p < 0.001), blood transfusion (OR = 2.57, 95 % CI = 2.10-3.13, p < 0.001), and intraoperative placement of a feeding tubes (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.62, p = 0.047) were independently associated with increased risk of morbidity. Association between tobacco use and morbidity was statistically marginal (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI = 0.99-1.53, p = 0.064). All-cause postoperative morbidity had significant associations with reoperation, readmission, and mortality (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mitigation of perioperative risk factors including smoking and malnutrition as well as identified operative considerations may improve outcomes after gastrectomy. Postoperative morbidity has the strongest association with other measures of poor outcome: reoperation, readmission, and mortality.

The impact of chronic liver disease on the risk assessment of ACS NSQIP morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk-adjustment model for patients who require hepatic resection does not include metrics of underlying chronic liver disease. The applicability of the current risk adjustment model is under debate. This study aims to assess the impact of chronic liver disease on the ACS NSQIP estimates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included all cases of hepatic resection at our quaternary referral institution between 2006 and 2013. Metrics of chronic liver disease were abstracted and linked with the ACS NSQIP risk-adjustment model estimated probabilities of morbidity and mortality for each case. Sequential general linear models were used to estimate differences in ACS NSQIP probabilities of morbidity and mortality associated with measures of underlying chronic liver disease. RESULTS: A total of 522 hepatic resections were performed during the study period. The patient cohort included 91 patients with fibrosis (17%) and 38 patients with cirrhosis (7%). The mean ACS NSQIP estimated probability of morbidity was 0.24 ± 0.11 and probability of mortality was 0.02 ± 0.02. Fibrosis was associated with increased probability of morbidity (0.26 ± 0.11; P = .019); cirrhosis was also associated with increased probability of morbidity (0.27 ± 0.10; P = .059). Parenchymal liver disease was not associated with increased probability of mortality (all P ≥ .62). Increased probabilities of mortality were associated with diagnosis and extent of resection (both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients selected for hepatectomy, metrics of chronic liver disease were associated with differences in ACS NSQIP estimated probability of morbidity. Incorporation of metrics of chronic liver disease into the ACS NSQIP targeted hepatectomy modules should improve estimates of risk after hepatic resection.

Morbidity and mortality of hepatectomy for benign liver tumors.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the morbidity and mortality following hepatectomy for benign liver tumors and hepatic metastases. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent hepatectomy for benign liver tumors and metastases reported to National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2005 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 5,542 patients underwent hepatectomy: 1,164 (21%) for benign and 4,378 (79%) for metastatic diseases. Patients with benign tumors were younger, predominantly female, and were less likely to have preoperative comorbidities (all P < .037). Rates of major complications including infections, embolism, renal failure, stroke, coma, cardiac arrest, reoperation, and ventilator dependence were similar between the 2 groups (all P ≥ .05). Thirty-day mortality was .9% among patients with benign tumors and 1.4% among patients with metastases (P = .128). After adjusting for significant effects of age and major complications (both P ≤ .007), benign vs malignant diagnosis and extent of hepatectomy was not associated with 30-day survival (both P ≥ .083). CONCLUSIONS: Despite patients with benign disease being younger and healthier, risks of major complications are similar after hepatectomy for benign and metastatic disease. Hepatectomy should be offered selectively for patients with benign liver tumors.

A Long Gastrojejunostomy Is Associated With Decreased Incidence and Severity of Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with increased hospital length of stay (LOS) and health care costs. We hypothesized that a long gastrojejunostomy for PD (LGPD) is associated with decreased incidence of DGE. METHODS: Data were reviewed from patients who underwent standard PD (SPD), pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD), or LGPD with a 9-cm-long anastomosis between August 2000 and July 2010. Primary outcomes included presence and grade of DGE and LOS. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition was used to define DGE. RESULTS: A total of 194 PDs (28 SPDs, 82 PPPDs, and 84 LGPDs) were performed. The rates of DGE were 46.4%, 37.8%, and 16.7%, respectively (P = 0.001). The LGPD was associated with fewer grades B/C DGE (2.4%) compared to SPD (10.7%) and PPPD (17.5%). Rates of postoperative abdominal fluid collection and abscess were similar among the groups. Patients with DGE had significantly longer LOS (14.0 vs 7.0 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study evaluating the effect of a long gastrojejunostomy on the incidence of DGE after PD. The LGPD is associated with significantly decreased DGE compared to SPD and PPPD and warrants further exploration as a means to improve outcome for patients who undergo PD.